Defining the Optimal Timing for Cochlear Implant Activation: A Review of the Literature and Current Practice Variability

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss is among the top three non-fatal disabling conditions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where cochlear implantation (CI), the gold standard for severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, remains underused. Conventionally, device activation occurs 2-4 weeks postoperatively however, early activation (EA) within days of surgery has shown promising benefits.

Objective & Methods: Literature reveals inconsistencies in defining EA and late activation (LA). Some studies report device activation as early as 1 to 7 days postoperatively, while others classify activation within 8 to 14 days as either EA or LA. Traditionally, activation has been reported between 9 and 46 days postoperatively. This lack of consensus complicates the development of standardized postoperative activation timelines and impedes evidence-based clinical guidelines. This narrative review aims to compare the outcomes, feasibility, and safety of EA versus traditional activation in CI patients while highlighting the variability in definitions and activation timelines across studies. A thorough literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Google.

Results: Seventeen studies were included, comprising 3 systematic reviews, 2 literature reviews, and 12 primary studies. Most studies reported EA on the first postoperative day, demonstrating benefits such as faster auditory rehabilitation, improved speech recognition, reduced anxiety, and higher patient satisfaction. EA was not associated with increased complications and was cost-effective, particularly for patients from remote areas. However, long-term impedance outcomes were similar between EA and LA.

Conclusion: First-day EA appears feasible, safe, and beneficial. Still, large-scale prospective studies are needed to establish optimal activation timing and support standardized CI care protocols.

731 101
PDF Downloads Trend
Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Copyright remains with the author(s). All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated.

How to Cite

1.
Shahid AH, Hashmi SQ, Noor M, Nauman K. Defining the Optimal Timing for Cochlear Implant Activation: A Review of the Literature and Current Practice Variability. Health Nexus. 2026;2:1-8. doi:10.63802/healthnexus.V2.2026.155

References

Bodington E, Saeed SR, Smith MCF, Stocks NG, Morse RP. A narrative review of the logistic and economic feasibility of cochlear implants in lower-income countries. Cochlear Implants Int. 2021;22(1):7-16. doi:10.1080/14670100.2020.1793070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2020.1793070

Crowson MG, Semenov YR, Tucci DL, Niparko JK. Quality of Life and Cost-Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants: A Narrative Review. Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(4-5):236-258. doi:10.1159/000481767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000481767

Bruschke S, Baumann U, Stöver T. Long-Term Follow-Up of Early Cochlear Implant Device Activation. Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(5):327-337. doi:10.1159/000512760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000512760

Batuk MO, Yarali M, Cinar BC, et al. Is Early Cochlear Implant Device Activation Safe for All on-the-Ear and off-the-Ear Sound Processors? Audiol Neurootol. 2019;24(6):279-284. doi:10.1159/000503378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000503378

Bruschke S, Baumann U, Stöver T. Residual low-frequency hearing after early device activation in cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;280(9):3977. doi:10.1007/s00405-023-07887-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07887-0

Saoji AA, Adkins WJ, Graham MK, Carlson ML. Does early activation within hours after cochlear implant surgery influence electrode impedances? Int J Audiol. 2022;61(6):520-525. doi:10.1080/14992027.2021.1942569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2021.1942569

Parker R, Muzaffar J, AuD MA, Brassington W. Early activation of cochlear implants: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Cochlear Implants Int. 2024;25(1):81-92. doi:10.1080/14670100.2023.2290777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2023.2290777

Alahmadi A, Abdelsamad Y, Alothman NI, et al. A Literature Review on Cochlear Implant Activation: From Weeks to Hours. Ear Nose Throat J. Published online August 8, 2023:1455613231188294. doi:10.1177/01455613231188294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613231188294

Coelho DH, Shiao AS, Li LPH. Very early activation of cochlear implants: A review of the literature. J Chin Med Assoc JCMA. 2023;86(1):7-10. doi:10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000816

Early activation after cochlear implantation: a systematic review | European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. Accessed November 19, 2024. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-023-07965-3

Soncini A, Franzini S, Di Marco F, et al. Early fitting in cochlear implant surgery: preliminary results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024;281(1):61-66. doi:10.1007/s00405-023-08076-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08076-9

Cochlear implant device activation and programming: 5 days postimplantation - PubMed. Accessed November 19, 2024. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24622029/

Hagr A, Garadat SN, Al-Momani M, Alsabellha RM, Almuhawas FA. Feasibility of one-day activation in cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(5):323-328. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.996824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.996824

Alhabib SF, Abdelsamad Y, Yousef M, Alzhrani F, Hagr A. Effect of early activation of cochlear implant on electrode impedance in pediatric population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;140:110543. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110543

Alahmadi A, Abdelsamad Y, Yousef M, et al. Cochlear Implantation: Long-Term Effect of Early Activation on Electrode Impedance. J Clin Med. 2024;13(11):3299. doi:10.3390/jcm13113299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113299

Sun CH, Chang CJ, Hsu CJ, Wu HP. Feasibility of early activation after cochlear implantation. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019;44(6):1004-1010. doi:10.1111/coa.13427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13427

Roux-Vaillard S, Pineau A, Laccourreye L, Boucher S. Immediate activation after cochlear implantation: Preliminary Study. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2020;137(1):17-20. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2019.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2019.09.009

Chen JKC, Chuang AYC, Sprinzl GM, Tung TH, Li LPH. Safety and feasibility of initial frequency mapping within 24 hours after cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 2015;135(6):592-597. doi:10.3109/00016489.2015.1006335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2015.1006335

Bresnihan M, Norman G, Scott F, Viani L. Measurement of Comfort Levels by Means of Electrical Stapedial Reflex in Children. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2001;127(8):963-966. doi:10.1001/archotol.127.8.963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.127.8.963

Park B, Thak PK, Park E, et al. Dynamic Range and Neural Response Threshold in Cochlear Implant Mapping Can Be Useful in Predicting Prognosis Related to Postoperative Speech Perception. J Audiol Otol. 2023;27(4):212. doi:10.7874/jao.2023.00374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2023.00374

Sonoyama T, Ishino T, Oda T, et al. Effectiveness of Expanded Instantaneous Input Dynamic Range Adjustment on Speech Perception. J Pers Med. 2022;12(11):1860. doi:10.3390/jpm12111860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111860

Early activation of a late sequential cochlear implant systematic review. J Otolaryngol-ENT Res. 2022;Volume 14(Issue 3). doi:10.15406/joentr.2022.14.00513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/joentr.2022.14.00513

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)