Consciousness and Reality: A Comparative Study of the Philosophical Foundationsof Marx and Hegel

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study offers a comparative analysis of the philosophical foundations of G. W. F. Hegel and Karl Marx with a focus on their respective conceptions of consciousness and reality. Drawing from classical texts and contemporary scholarship, it reconstructs Hegel’s dialectical idealism, which views reality as the unfolding of Absolute Spirit, and contrasts it with Marx’s materialist dialectics, which locates consciousness in socio-historical praxis. The analysis highlights Marx’s critique of Feuerbach’s abstract humanism and Stirner’s radical egoism, culminating in the notion of the “real individual” as historically situated and socially embedded. Through a layered examination of method, history, subjectivity, and community, the paper demonstrates how Marx inherits and subverts Hegel’s philosophical system, transforming it into a critical theory of liberation. This dialogue between idealism and materialism, abstract freedom and practical emancipation, remains vital for understanding contemporary structures of power, ideology, and agency.

1300 261
PDF Downloads Trend
Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Copyright remains with the author(s). All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated.

How to Cite

Song, C., & Wu, M. (2025). Consciousness and Reality: A Comparative Study of the Philosophical Foundationsof Marx and Hegel. Global Review of Humanities, Arts, and Society, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.63802/grhas.v1.i1.2

References

Antonio, R. J. (1981). Immanent critique as the core of critical theory: Its origins and developments in Hegel, Marx and contemporary thought. British Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 330–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/589281

Badiou, A., Bellassen, J., & Mossot, L. (2011). The rational kernel of the Hegelian dialectic. re.press.

Berto, F. (2007). Hegel’s dialectics as a semantic theory: An analytic reading. Dialectica, 61(3), 331–354.

Blunden, A. (2021). Hegel and Marx in their time: The difference context makes. Studies in East European Thought.

Buchwalter, A. (1991). Hegel, Marx, and the concept of immanent critique. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 29(2), 253–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1991.0037

Cesarale, G. (2011). Marx and Hegel: The logic of history. Kantian Review.

Duquette, D. A. (1989). Marx’s idealist critique of Hegel’s theory of society and politics. The Review of Politics, 51(2), 218–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500048099

Flohr, M. (2024). Karl Marx’s critique of the state as an alienation of society in his 1843 Critique of Hegel’s Doctrine of State. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 25(3), 361–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2023.2173268

Fraser, I. (1997). Hegel and Marx: The concept of need. Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780585086828

Gadamer, H.-G. (1976). Hegel’s dialectic: Five hermeneutical studies. Yale University Press.

Jeko, V. O., & Ndidi, O. J. (2024). An evaluation of Karl Marx's critique of philosophy, religion and ideology. University of Africa Journal of Governance and Politics, 94.

Jiacheng, S. U. N. (2024). Rethinking the relationship between the young Marx and Feuerbach’s philosophy. Journal of Jishou University (Social Sciences Edition), 45(1), 139.

Marx, K. (1844). Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher, 7, 261–271.

Marx, K. (1970). Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (J. O’Malley, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology (C. J. Arthur, Ed.). Lawrence & Wishart.

Maybee, J. E. (2016). Hegel’s dialectics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

McKenna, T. (2011). Hegelian dialectics. Critique, 39(1), 155–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2011.537458

Ng, K. (2015). Ideology critique from Hegel and Marx to critical theory. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical & Democratic Theory, 22(3), 380–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12170

O’Neill, J. (Ed.). (1996). Hegel's dialectic of desire and recognition: Texts and commentary. State University of New York Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438415123

Priest, G. (1989). Dialectic and dialetheic. Science & Society, 53(4), 388–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003682378905300401

Rosen, M. (1984). Hegel's dialectic and its criticism. Cambridge University Press.

Stirner, M. (1995). The ego and its own (D. Leopold, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1844)

Wilén, C. (2025). Formalism and instrumentalism in the Marxist critique of right. Rethinking Marxism, 37(1), 96–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2024.2435774

Yang, C. (2024). Explaining Marxist dialectics: The dialectical traditions of Hegel and Marx. Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 21(2).

Zambrana, R. (2025). Philosophy in the severe style: Method and value in Rose's Hegel and Marx. Thesis Eleven. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136251316573

Deng, X. (2008). Makesi cong Heige’er nali jicheng le shenme? Makesizhuyi yu Xianshi, 2008(02), 4–8.

Guo, G. (2025). Cong ziran guan dao bianzhengfa: Makesi dui Heige’er ziran zhexue de pipan yu goujian. Ziran Bianzhengfa Yanjiu, 41(02), 33–39+59.

Han, L. (2009). Cong Fei’erbaha de yihua dao Heige’er de yihua: Makesi de sixiang zhuanbian. Sixiang Zhanxian, 35(06), 67–71.

Liu, H., & Xiao, S. (2016). Yihua sixiang de bianzheng yanyi: Heige’er, Fei’erbaha yu Makesi. Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Renwen Kexue Ban), 69(06), 60–67.

Liu, T., & Chen, X. (2013). Zhexue de mingyun yu wuchan jieji de jiushu. Guangdong Shehui Kexue, 2013(06), 60–66.

Sun, Z. (2008). Bianzhengfa: Heige’er, Makesi yu hou xing’ershangxue. Zhongguo Shehui Kexue, 2008(03), 28–39+204.

Wu, X. (2018). Bianzhengfa de bentilun jichu: Heige’er yu Makesi. Zhexue Yanjiu, 2018(10), 3–17+128.

Yuyujin. (2011). Makesi dui Heige’er fangfalun de gaizao ji qi qishi. Fudan Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban), 2011(01), 2–10.

Zhang, S. (2016). Zai lun Makesi dui Heige’er fazhexue de pipan. Zhexue Yanjiu, 2016(06), 35–41+128.

Zhang, Y. (2021). Fouding bianzhengfa: Tanxun zhuti waixian, duixiangxing yihua ji qi yangqi. Zhongguo Shehui Kexue, 2021(08), 52–77+205.

Zhu, X. (2007). Yihua de yangqi: Cong zhengzhi pipan dao shehui pipan. Huadong Shifan Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban), 2007(03), 78–83+100.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)