An Exploration of the Interaction Mechanism Between the Dancing Body and the Environment from the Perspective of Ecological Perception

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study employs ecological perception theory to examine its application and significance in dance improvisation and choreography. The theory emphasizes the direct coupling of perception and action, whereby movement emerges dynamically through the dancer–environment interaction. Three dimensions are highlighted: affordances, referring to how dancers perceive physical and spatial properties as potential movement possibilities; the perception–action loop, underscoring the ongoing refinement and extension of movement through embodied experience; and body–environment coupling, which conceptualizes dance not as an isolated creative act but as a process of co-construction with the environment. Case analyses from natural sites, urban spaces, and multimedia stages demonstrate how environmental features operate as sources of choreographic inspiration. The paper concludes that adopting an ecological perception perspective can enhance the openness of improvisation, support site-specific experimentation, and foster the development of interdisciplinary approaches in dance education and creative practice.

1002 401
PDF Downloads Trend
Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Copyright remains with the author(s). All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated.

How to Cite

Shi, K., & Lin, Z. (2025). An Exploration of the Interaction Mechanism Between the Dancing Body and the Environment from the Perspective of Ecological Perception. Global Review of Humanities, Arts, and Society, 1(4), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.63802/grhas.v1.i4.109

References

Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218

程相占.(2022).生态艺术学的建构思路与整体框架探析. 艺术评论(12),63-73.https://doi.org/10.16364/j.cnki.cn11-4907/j.2022.12.005. (Cheng, X. (2022). A study on the construction approach and overall framework of ecological art studies. Art Review, (12), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.16364/j.cnki.cn11-4907/j.2022.12.005)

Newton, R. (2022). Embodying an Ecological Condition: Dance Practices and the Development of Embodied Ecological Awareness (Master's thesis, University of New South Wales (Australia)).

Eno, D. E. (2018). Mountain Dance: A Transdisciplinary Exploration of Environmental Dance as an Autopoietic Expression of Ecological Connectivity and Synthesis (Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University).

Pini, S. (2019). Stage presence in dance: A cognitive ecological ethnographic approach (Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University).

Baines, L. (2015). Dance, embodiment, and cultural ecology: The reflexive relationship between bodies & space. Mills College. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cor.2016.1

崔鑫慧.(2020).自然形态中动植物元素在舞蹈创作中的实际运用. 艺术品鉴(17),117-119. (Cui, X. (2020). Practical application of animal and plant elements in natural forms to dance choreography. Art Appreciation, (17), 117–119.)

Laidlaw, B. (2021). The ecological imperative and function of dance: A literature review. Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, 13(1-2), 95-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/jdsp_00039_1

Vissicaro, P. (2023). Embodying Earth: dance culture, ecology, and the entanglement of wellbeing (Master's thesis, Northern Arizona University).

Heft, H. (2021). Perceiving “natural” environments: An ecological perspective with reflections on the chapters. In Nature and psychology: Biological, cognitive, developmental, and social pathways to well-being (pp. 235-273). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69020-5_8

Kimmel, M., & Hristova, D. (2021). The Micro-genesis of Improvisational Co-creation. Creativity Research Journal, 33(4), 347–375. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2021.1922197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1922197

Kronsted, C. (2021). Using Affordances to Teach Improvisational Dance. Journal of Dance Education, 21(3), 168–175. DOI: 10.1080/15290824.2021.1937184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2021.1937184

Kimmel, M., & Groth, C. (2023). What affords being creative? Opportunities for novelty in light of perception, embodied activity, and imaginative skill. Frontiers / (published online 2023; issue dated 2024 Jun). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123231179488

Deans, C., & Pini, S. (2022). Skilled performance in Contact Improvisation: the importance of interkinaesthetic sense of agency. Synthese, 200, 139 (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03629-7

Image Citation:

Photo: Liu Chen-hsiang, 2013. Courtesy of Cloud Gate Dance Theatre, “Rice” production page.

URL: https://www.cloudgate.org.tw/en/cg/node/528.

Museum Folkwang. (2023, September 2). Cultural Festival We are in the Garden: Planetary Dance. Photo credit: John Veltri & Marguerite Lorimer; Courtesy the Estate of Anna Halprin. https://www.museum-folkwang.de/en/event/cultural-festival-we-are-garden-planetary-dance

Wang, Lei. Stage photo of “Maling’er Rings the Song of Happiness.” 2025. Photograph. Tongliao Net. Accessed September 23, 2025. https://www.tongliaowang.com/2025/01/16/99701101.html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3076335

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)