Article Types
JPOII considers several forms of scholarly contribution. Authors should identify the proposed article type and use a structure suited to its question, evidence and intended contribution.
Research and evidence synthesis
| Original Research | Theoretical or empirical work advancing an identifiable research question. Explain design, evidence, analysis and limitations; relate the findings to oversight or institutional integrity. |
|---|---|
| Review Article | A critical synthesis that organizes a field, assesses competing explanations or identifies a research agenda. Explain the literature selection approach and analytical framework. |
| Systematic Review or Meta-analysis | A reproducible synthesis with explicit eligibility criteria, search methods, selection procedures, appraisal and synthesis. Identify any protocol and departures from it. |
| Comparative, Legal or Institutional Analysis | A substantive examination of oversight arrangements, public law or institutional practice. Define comparators, sources, jurisdiction and the basis of interpretation. |
Methods and shorter contributions
Methodological articles develop or assess research designs, measures, data construction or analytical tools relevant to oversight research. Show how the proposed method improves inquiry and discuss its assumptions, validation and limits.
Research notes present a focused result, replication, carefully documented null finding or concise methodological contribution. Brevity does not remove requirements for a sufficient evidentiary basis and transparent reporting.
Perspectives and policy analyses advance a clearly argued scholarly position or evaluate an institutional or policy problem. They must engage evidence and relevant literature and distinguish proposals from demonstrated effects. They are not a route for unsupported accusations or promotional institutional accounts.
Choosing a suitable form
Select the article type according to the contribution rather than the length of a manuscript alone. The editor may suggest a different form if the argument or evidence supports it. Manuscripts should be concise while supplying the information required for assessment; extensive documentation may be placed in appropriately organized supplementary material.
Research and review articles undergo external peer review. Editorials and other editorial material, where published, should be identified as such and should not imply that they received the same review as a research article. The Peer Review policy explains the assessment framework.
Updated 5 October 2026 · Questions: JPOII Editorial Office