How Modern Academia Shapes Philosophical Questioning: Institutional Conditions, Logics of Publishability, andInstitutional Silence
Main Article Content
Authors
S I L E N C E
Abstract
This article challenges the widely held assumption that philosophical questions arise spontaneously from thought itself. By situating contemporary philosophy within the institutional transformations of neoliberal higher education, it argues that inquiry is pre-structured by what is termed the logic of publishability. Through an analysis of evaluation metrics, grant-based project governance, and journal gatekeeping, the paper conceptualizes a “triple mechanism” that regulates not the answers philosophers produce, but the forms, tempos, and boundaries of the questions they are permitted to ask.
The dominance of gap-spotting as a model of innovation, the demand for methodological controllability, and the requirement for definitive conclusions function as anticipatory filters at the inception of inquiry. Building on insights from agnotology and the sociology of absences, this article introduces the concept of Institutional Silence to describe the structural exclusion of foundational, slow, or non-instrumental philosophical problems. It further examines the paradox of metacritique, arguing that reflexivity itself has become institutionalized and ritualized within contemporary academic writing.
Rather than advocating for administrative reforms, the article introduces the concepts of slow questions and Quiet Research as intellectual approaches that resist acceleration, metric fetishism, and epistemic domestication. The paper concludes by leaving open the question of whether philosophy, under current institutional conditions, is still genuinely asking questions or merely managing them within a standardized regime of conceptual production.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright remains with the author(s). All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated.
How to Cite
References
Adam, B. (2003). Reflexive modernization temporalized. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2), 59–76.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus (P. Collier, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1984).
Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labour process under monopoly capitalism. University of Chicago Press.
Gannon, S., & Taylor, C. (2021). The flexible time economy of contemporary academic work. Higher Education.
Haack, S. (2017). Scientism and its discontents. Rounded Globe.
Newfield, C. (2021). Universities after neoliberalism. Radical Philosophy, 210.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. Sage.
Heesen, R., & Bright, L. K. (2020). Is peer review a good idea? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Locke, K., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1023–1062.
Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Houghton Mifflin.
Katz, D., & Allport, F. H. (1931). Students’ attitudes. Craftsman Press.
Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. Oxford University Press.
Medina, J. (2023). The epistemology of protest: Silencing, epistemic activism, and the communicative life of resistance. Oxford University Press.
Mills, C. W. (1997). The racial contract. Cornell University Press.
Mills, C. W. (2007). White ignorance. In S. Sullivan & N. Tuana (Eds.), Race and epistemologies of ignorance (pp. 11–38). SUNY Press.
Proctor, R. N. (2008). Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance. In R. N. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology:
The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford University Press.
Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Paradigm Publishers.
Smithson, M. (1989). Ignorance and uncertainty: Emerging paradigms. Springer.
Anker, E. S., & Felski, R. (Eds.). (2017). Critique and postcritique. Duke University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1968).
Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique. Oxford University Press.
Lash, S. (2002). Critique of information. Sage.
Stengers, I. (2018). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science (S. Muecke, Trans.). Polity Press.
The Slow Science Academy. (2010). The slow science manifesto. Berlin.
Article Sidebar
Download
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.