The Evolution and Future Trajectory of ESG Information Disclosure for Green Bonds in China: A Policy Transfer and Communication Perspective
Main Article Content
Authors
University of Malaya, Malaysia
Abstract
This study explores the evolution and future trajectory of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) information disclosure in China’s green bond market through an integrated theoretical framework combining policy transfer theory, communication theory, and institutional analysis. Since the release of the Green Financial Bond Guidelines by the People’s Bank of China in 2016, China has become the world’s second-largest green bond market, with cumulative issuances exceeding $130 billion by 2023. Employing a multi-level institutional analysis that incorporates Dolowitz and Marsh’s policy transfer model and Bennett and Howlett’s policy learning theory, the study identifies four developmental phases: the Foundation Period (pre-2016), Rapid Development Period (2016–2020), Standardization and Integration Period (2021–2023), and the Comprehensive Framework Period (2024–present). The findings reveal that China’s ESG disclosure approach is characterized by selective policy transfer, strategic adaptation, and narrative construction—neither full convergence with international norms nor complete divergence. Through coordinated regulatory efforts, active participation in international discourse, and strategic differentiation between binding and non-binding instruments, China has enhanced the quality, consistency, and global compatibility of ESG disclosures. Notable milestones include the 2021 removal of “clean coal” from eligible green projects and the 2024 implementation of mandatory ESG disclosure for major stock indices. This research contributes to the understanding of policy transfer in emerging markets and illustrates how global governance norms are localized through institutional innovation and strategic communication. The study provides new insights into ESG governance, particularly in contexts where regulatory sovereignty and international engagement must be balanced.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright remains with the author(s). All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated.
How to Cite
References
Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294.
Climate Bonds Initiative. (2024). China solidifies leadership in green finance for 2023.
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357.
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23.
European Commission & People's Bank of China. (2021). Common ground taxonomy: Climate change mitigation. Brussels & Beijing: EC-PBoC.
Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. University of South Carolina Press.
Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.
Li, Z., Zhang, H., & Chen, M. (2024). Role of green bonds in developing ESG projects in Eastern provinces of China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1742.
Meseguer, C. (2005). Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order. The ANNALS of the American Academy, 598(1), 67–82.
Ministry of Finance. (2024). Basic guidelines for corporate sustainability disclosure. Beijing: MOF.
Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. Routledge.
Wang, X., & Liu, Q. (2024). Information disclosure and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from green bond issuance in China. Research in International Business and Finance.
Yang, M., & Zhou, T. (2024). Sustainable pathways: ESG disclosure performance and optimization in China. Sustainability, 16(11), 4630.
Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., & Lan, K. (2024). Does green finance policy contribute to ESG disclosure of listed companies? SAGE Open, 14(1).
Article Sidebar
Download
This study is based entirely on publicly available regulatory documents, policy guidelines, and secondary data sources. No proprietary or confidential data were used. All sources are cited in the reference list.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.