AI and Research Integrity Policy|AI与研究诚信政策
Contemporary Review of Political Thought recognizes that artificial intelligence tools may assist authors, reviewers, and editors in certain aspects of scholarly work. At the same time, the journal requires that all use of artificial intelligence be transparent, responsible, ethical, and consistent with academic integrity.
《当代政治思想评论》承认人工智能工具可以在学术写作、语言处理、资料整理和编辑工作中发挥一定辅助作用。同时,本刊要求所有人工智能使用均应保持透明、负责、合乎伦理,并符合学术诚信要求。
General Principle|基本原则
Artificial intelligence tools may be used to support scholarly work, but they cannot replace the author’s responsibility for originality, accuracy, interpretation, argumentation, evidence, citation, ethical compliance, and final manuscript content.
人工智能工具可以作为学术工作的辅助工具,但不能替代作者对原创性、准确性、解释、论证、证据、引用、伦理合规与最终稿件内容所承担的责任。
Authors remain fully responsible for all content submitted to the journal, including any text, translation, data analysis, references, images, tables, or other materials generated, edited, or assisted by artificial intelligence tools.
作者须对提交至本刊的所有内容承担全部责任,包括任何由人工智能工具生成、修改或辅助完成的文字、翻译、数据分析、参考文献、图片、表格或其他材料。
Definition of AI Tools|人工智能工具定义
For the purpose of this policy, artificial intelligence tools include, but are not limited to, generative AI systems, large language models, machine translation systems, AI-assisted writing tools, grammar correction tools, image generation tools, coding assistants, data analysis tools, reference-generation tools, and automated summarization systems.
本政策所称人工智能工具包括但不限于生成式人工智能系统、大语言模型、机器翻译系统、AI辅助写作工具、语法修正工具、图像生成工具、代码辅助工具、数据分析工具、参考文献生成工具以及自动摘要系统。
Permitted Uses|允许使用的情形
Authors may use AI tools for limited and appropriate assistance, provided that such use does not compromise originality, accuracy, academic integrity, confidentiality, or ethical compliance.
作者可以在有限且适当的范围内使用人工智能工具,但不得损害稿件原创性、准确性、学术诚信、保密性或伦理合规性。
Permitted uses may include:
允许使用的情形包括:
- Language editing and grammar correction|语言润色与语法修正
- Translation assistance, subject to author verification|翻译辅助,但须由作者核查
- Formatting support|格式整理辅助
- Reference checking or bibliographic organization, subject to author verification|参考文献核查或书目信息整理,但须由作者核查
- Preliminary organization of notes or research materials|研究笔记或资料的初步整理
- Data cleaning or coding assistance, where appropriately disclosed and verified|数据清理或代码辅助,但须适当披露并核验
- Improving readability without changing scholarly meaning|在不改变学术含义的前提下提升文本可读性
Prohibited Uses|禁止使用的情形
AI tools must not be used in ways that produce misleading, fabricated, plagiarized, unverifiable, or ethically problematic content.
不得以产生误导性、伪造性、抄袭性、不可核实或存在伦理问题的内容为目的使用人工智能工具。
Prohibited uses include:
禁止使用的情形包括:
- Generating false, fabricated, or unverifiable references|生成虚假、伪造或不可核实的参考文献
- Fabricating data, evidence, quotations, archival materials, interview records, or survey results|伪造数据、证据、引文、档案材料、访谈记录或问卷结果
- Using AI-generated text without author verification and scholarly responsibility|未经作者核查并承担学术责任而使用AI生成文本
- Submitting AI-generated work as original human scholarship|将AI生成内容作为原创人类学术成果提交
- Using AI tools to manipulate images, tables, data, or evidence in a misleading way|以误导性方式使用AI工具修改图片、表格、数据或证据
- Uploading confidential manuscripts, reviewer reports, personal data, or sensitive research materials to unauthorized AI systems|将保密稿件、审稿意见、个人数据或敏感研究材料上传至未经授权的AI系统
- Using AI tools to evade plagiarism detection or research integrity checks|使用AI工具规避抄袭检测或研究诚信审查
AI Authorship|AI作者身份
Artificial intelligence tools cannot be listed as authors, co-authors, corresponding authors, contributors, or guarantors of a manuscript.
人工智能工具不得列为作者、共同作者、通讯作者、贡献者或稿件责任保证人。
Authorship is limited to human contributors who meet the journal’s authorship criteria and can take responsibility for the integrity, originality, accuracy, and ethical compliance of the work.
作者身份仅限于符合本刊作者资格标准、并能够对作品完整性、原创性、准确性与伦理合规承担责任的人类贡献者。
AI tools cannot approve the final manuscript, respond to reviewer comments, sign copyright or licensing agreements, disclose conflicts of interest, or accept responsibility for research misconduct.
人工智能工具不能批准最终稿件、回应审稿意见、签署版权或许可协议、披露利益冲突,也不能对学术不端承担责任。
Disclosure Requirement|披露要求
Authors must disclose any substantive use of AI tools in the preparation of a manuscript. Substantive use includes AI assistance that affects the intellectual content, interpretation, analysis, argument, data processing, translation, image generation, coding, or writing of the manuscript.
作者必须披露在稿件准备过程中对人工智能工具的实质性使用。实质性使用包括影响稿件智识内容、解释、分析、论证、数据处理、翻译、图像生成、代码生成或写作过程的AI辅助。
Minor grammar correction, spelling correction, or formatting assistance does not normally require detailed disclosure, provided that it does not affect the scholarly content of the manuscript.
如仅用于轻微语法修正、拼写修正或格式整理,且不影响稿件学术内容,通常无需作详细披露。
Where AI tools have been used substantively, authors should include a statement in the manuscript or submission files identifying the tool used, the purpose of use, and the author’s verification of the output.
如作者对人工智能工具进行了实质性使用,应在稿件或投稿文件中说明所使用的工具、使用目的,以及作者对相关输出内容所作的核查。
Suggested AI Disclosure Statement|AI使用披露声明示例
Authors may use the following statement where applicable:
如适用,作者可使用以下声明:
AI Use Disclosure: The author(s) used [name of AI tool] for [specific purpose, such as language editing, translation assistance, data processing, or formatting support]. The author(s) reviewed, verified, and take full responsibility for the accuracy, originality, integrity, and ethical compliance of the final manuscript.
人工智能使用披露:作者使用了[人工智能工具名称]用于[具体用途,如语言润色、翻译辅助、数据处理或格式整理]。作者已对相关内容进行审查与核验,并对最终稿件的准确性、原创性、完整性与伦理合规承担全部责任。
If no AI tools were used substantively, authors may state:
如未实质性使用人工智能工具,作者可声明:
AI Use Disclosure: The author(s) declare that no artificial intelligence tools were substantively used in the preparation of this manuscript.
人工智能使用披露:作者声明,在本稿件准备过程中未实质性使用人工智能工具。
Responsibility for Accuracy|准确性责任
AI-generated content may contain errors, invented references, inaccurate translations, false summaries, biased interpretations, or misleading statements. Authors must independently verify all AI-assisted content before submission.
人工智能生成内容可能包含错误、虚构参考文献、不准确翻译、错误摘要、偏见性解释或误导性表述。作者必须在投稿前独立核查所有AI辅助生成或修改的内容。
Authors are responsible for checking all citations, quotations, translations, names, dates, data, factual claims, and bibliographic information.
作者有责任核查所有引用、引文、译文、姓名、日期、数据、事实性陈述与书目信息。
References and Citations|参考文献与引用
Authors must not rely on AI tools to generate references without independent verification. All references must correspond to real, accessible, and accurately cited sources.
作者不得在未独立核查的情况下依赖人工智能工具生成参考文献。所有参考文献必须对应真实、可访问且准确引用的资料来源。
Fabricated references, inaccurate DOI information, invented page numbers, or misleading bibliographic entries may be treated as research integrity concerns.
虚构参考文献、不准确的 DOI 信息、伪造页码或误导性书目条目,均可能被视为研究诚信问题。
AI in Translation and Language Editing|AI翻译与语言润色
AI tools may be used for translation or language editing, but authors must verify the accuracy, terminology, tone, and scholarly meaning of the translated or edited text.
作者可以使用人工智能工具进行翻译或语言润色,但必须核查译文或修改文本的准确性、术语使用、表达语气与学术含义。
The use of AI translation does not remove the author’s responsibility for language quality and conceptual precision.
使用AI翻译并不免除作者对语言质量与概念准确性的责任。
AI in Data Analysis and Coding|AI数据分析与代码辅助
If AI tools are used for data cleaning, coding, statistical assistance, qualitative coding, text analysis, visualization, or other analytical tasks, authors must disclose the use where it affects the research process or findings.
如作者使用人工智能工具进行数据清理、代码生成、统计辅助、质性编码、文本分析、可视化或其他分析任务,并且该使用影响研究过程或研究结果,作者必须予以披露。
Authors must be able to explain and verify the methods, procedures, assumptions, and outputs involved in AI-assisted analysis.
作者必须能够解释并核验AI辅助分析所涉及的方法、程序、假设与输出结果。
AI-Generated Images, Tables, and Media|AI生成图片、表格与媒体材料
AI-generated or AI-modified images, tables, diagrams, visualizations, audio, video, or other media materials must be clearly disclosed where they are included in a manuscript.
如稿件包含AI生成或AI修改的图片、表格、图示、可视化、音频、视频或其他媒体材料,作者必须明确披露。
Authors must ensure that AI-generated or AI-assisted materials do not infringe copyright, privacy, publicity rights, confidentiality, or ethical standards.
作者必须确保AI生成或AI辅助制作的材料不侵犯版权、隐私权、肖像权、保密义务或伦理规范。
AI tools must not be used to manipulate research evidence or visual materials in a way that misleads readers, reviewers, or editors.
不得使用AI工具以误导读者、审稿人或编辑的方式操控研究证据或视觉材料。
Confidentiality and Data Protection|保密与数据保护
Authors, reviewers, and editors must not upload confidential, unpublished, personal, sensitive, or restricted materials to AI systems unless they have the legal right and explicit authorization to do so.
作者、审稿人和编辑不得将保密、未发表、个人、敏感或受限制材料上传至人工智能系统,除非其具有相应法律权利并已获得明确授权。
This includes unpublished manuscripts, reviewer reports, editorial correspondence, personal data, interview transcripts, survey responses, confidential institutional materials, and copyrighted third-party content.
相关材料包括未发表稿件、审稿意见、编辑通信、个人数据、访谈记录、问卷回答、保密机构材料以及受版权保护的第三方内容。
AI Use by Reviewers|审稿人使用AI
Reviewers must treat manuscripts under review as confidential documents. Reviewers should not upload manuscripts or any part of reviewer materials to AI tools unless explicitly authorized by the editorial office and permitted by applicable confidentiality and data protection rules.
审稿人必须将评审中的稿件视为保密文件。未经编辑部明确授权,且在不符合保密与数据保护规则的情况下,审稿人不得将稿件或任何审稿材料上传至人工智能工具。
Reviewers may use basic language tools for their own review comments where appropriate, but they remain fully responsible for the content, accuracy, fairness, and confidentiality of their review.
审稿人可在适当情况下使用基础语言工具辅助撰写评审意见,但须对评审意见的内容、准确性、公正性与保密性承担全部责任。
AI Use by Editors|编辑使用AI
Editors may use AI tools only in ways that respect confidentiality, editorial independence, data protection, and publication integrity. AI tools must not replace human editorial judgment.
编辑仅可在尊重保密性、编辑独立性、数据保护与出版诚信的前提下使用人工智能工具。人工智能工具不得替代人类编辑判断。
Editorial decisions must be made by qualified human editors based on academic merit, peer-review evidence, ethical compliance, and journal policy.
编辑决定必须由具备资格的人类编辑依据稿件学术价值、同行评审证据、伦理合规与期刊政策作出。
Research Integrity Standards|研究诚信标准
The journal expects all research to be conducted and reported honestly, accurately, and transparently. Authors must not fabricate, falsify, manipulate, or selectively present evidence in a misleading manner.
本刊要求所有研究均以诚实、准确和透明的方式开展与报告。作者不得以误导性方式伪造、篡改、操控或选择性呈现证据。
Research materials, data, textual sources, quotations, translations, archival records, interview materials, and analytical procedures should be presented accurately and responsibly.
研究材料、数据、文本来源、引文、译文、档案记录、访谈材料与分析程序均应以准确、负责的方式呈现。
Human Participants and Sensitive Data|人类参与者与敏感数据
Manuscripts involving human participants, interviews, surveys, personal data, or sensitive materials must comply with applicable ethical standards and legal requirements.
涉及人类参与者、访谈、问卷调查、个人数据或敏感材料的稿件,必须遵守适用的伦理标准与法律要求。
AI tools must not be used to process identifiable or sensitive participant data unless the authors have appropriate consent, legal basis, institutional approval, and adequate data protection measures.
除非作者已获得适当知情同意、法律依据、机构审批,并采取充分数据保护措施,否则不得使用AI工具处理可识别身份或敏感的参与者数据。
Plagiarism, Text Recycling, and AI-Generated Similarity|抄袭、文本重复与AI生成相似性
Authors must ensure that all submitted work is original and properly cited. AI-assisted rewriting must not be used to disguise plagiarism, inappropriate paraphrasing, duplicate publication, or excessive text recycling.
作者必须确保所提交作品具有原创性并规范引用。不得使用AI辅助改写来掩盖抄袭、不当改写、重复发表或过度文本重复。
The editorial office may use plagiarism detection tools, AI-use screening tools, bibliographic checks, or other appropriate methods to evaluate originality and research integrity.
编辑部可使用文本检测工具、AI使用筛查工具、参考文献核查或其他适当方法评估稿件原创性与研究诚信。
Corrections and Post-Publication Concerns|更正与出版后问题
If undisclosed AI use, AI-generated errors, fabricated references, unreliable data, ethical violations, or other integrity concerns are identified after publication, the journal may issue a correction, expression of concern, retraction, or other appropriate notice.
如文章出版后发现未披露的AI使用、AI生成错误、虚假参考文献、不可靠数据、伦理违规或其他诚信问题,本刊可发布更正、关注声明、撤稿声明或其他适当通知。
The journal may request explanations, supporting materials, original data, revision records, AI-use records, or other relevant documentation from authors when necessary.
必要时,本刊可要求作者提供说明、支持材料、原始数据、修改记录、AI使用记录或其他相关文件。
Failure to Disclose AI Use|未披露AI使用
Failure to disclose substantive AI use may be treated as a research integrity concern. Depending on the seriousness of the issue, the journal may request clarification, require revision, reject the manuscript, delay publication, issue a correction, or take other appropriate editorial action.
未披露实质性AI使用可能被视为研究诚信问题。根据问题严重程度,本刊可要求作者说明、修改稿件、退稿、延迟出版、发布更正或采取其他适当编辑措施。
Final Responsibility|最终责任
The use of AI tools does not reduce or transfer responsibility from authors to technology providers. Authors remain fully accountable for the submitted and published work.
使用人工智能工具并不会减少作者责任,也不会将责任转移给技术提供方。作者仍须对提交与发表的作品承担全部责任。
The editorial office reserves the right to reject, correct, or retract work that fails to meet the journal’s AI and research integrity standards.
对于不符合本刊AI与研究诚信标准的作品,编辑部保留退稿、更正或撤稿的权利。
Policy Updates|政策更新
The journal may update this policy when necessary to reflect changes in artificial intelligence technologies, academic publishing standards, legal requirements, editorial practice, or research integrity expectations.
本刊可根据人工智能技术、学术出版标准、法律要求、编辑实践或研究诚信要求的变化,对本政策进行必要更新。